Public Trust Surface
Moderation Policy
All public submissions and editorial revisions are reviewed before publication. No public-facing claim is published without citation support, moderator review, and clear provenance boundaries.
Reading Posture
These pages explain how to interpret the public record, moderation boundaries, and provenance-first editorial practice.
How moderation works
Moderation exists to keep public content source-grounded, correction-aware, and non-harmful. This page explains what gets reviewed, what gets rejected, and how moderation differs from silent removal or hidden editing.
- Public submissions are reviewed before publication and are not automatically visible on the site.
- Editorial revisions move through draft, proposal, publication, and revert history with visible public revision records.
- Unsupported sensitive material, private data, or targeting-oriented content is rejected or redacted rather than published.
Limits of the record
What this page shows
PedoPedia presents official imported fields, editor-written sourced narrative, and approved related materials in separate visible bands so readers can trace what comes from where.
What this page does not prove
The page does not prove current location details, exhaustive criminal history, or any claim beyond what the cited official/public sources support.
- Absence from this site is not proof of absence from criminal history.
- Presence on this site is not a license for confrontation, threats, or harassment.
- This site does not publish maps, sightings, or pursuit-oriented workflows.
Why timestamps matter
Official registries and supporting sources can update after publication. Freshness labels, first-import times, snapshot history, and revision history show how current each layer is.
How corrections and revisions work
Official-source issues are referred through the official authority pathway, while site/editorial issues are reviewed through revision control. Public correction states remain visible instead of silently overwriting history.
Related reading: Glossary | Methodology | Correction policy | Education hub
Submission review
Submission outcomes remain evidence-driven: approve, reject, or request more support. Public-facing claims require a traceable basis before they can appear on an article or correction surface.
Revision review
Editorial updates preserve revision history. Publication and reversion events remain visible through the public revision and change surfaces rather than silently replacing prior versions.
Sensitive-material handling
Private identifiers, unsupported allegations, harassment-oriented details, and other unsafe material are excluded from public output even when submitted through a legitimate intake path.